The New Hampshire Supreme Court initially clarified that the husband had not requested a review of an unsigned or oral agreement. On the contrary, he attempted to impose a conjugal agreement that was both written and signed, when he was unable to provide an actual copy for the court. In 2011, the husband tried to enforce the marriage arrangement. However, the woman claimed that she could not find the original. The husband requested the presentation of the copy as evidence of the case where the original could not have been found. There was a call. The husband argued that the court was wrong in accepting the truth of the facts he claimed. Moreover, the Tribunal only misreought whether the agreement currently existed and not whether it ever existed. The woman argued that as no documents had ever been submitted, the court duly decided that she did not have the legal authority to review it. Other cases involving contracts that could not be brought could be tried and evidence of these agreements was provided in the form of testimony from lawyers involved in their development. While marital agreements have some impact on what happens after the death of one of the spouses, marital agreements are a more important instrument for future divorces. To clarify what happens after the death of one of the parties, the parties should cooperate with an estate planning lawyer to ensure that their wills, trusts and other estate planning documents are compliant and that they have been duly updated as circumstances change (the parties` recent marriage). In April 2012, the woman rejected the marriage agreement application, arguing that the husband had not provided a copy of an agreement she had signed and that any allegations of oral or unsigned agreements were unenforceable.

The woman replied that she did not remember signing a marriage contract, that she had never owned one, and even if she had signed it, such an action would not have been voluntary, but rather under duress. A few months later, a hearing was held and the husband admitted that he could not find the original or a copy of the agreement. In light of the above, the Tribunal granted the request to dismiss the application to enforce the agreement. IST DAS DAS ALS POSTNUPTIAL AGREEMENT: It is preferable that the marriage agreement be fully negotiated and signed before the marriage. After the marriage, the parties can still change the terms of the marriage agreement by another contract. Such additional changes must be written down, signed by the parties, with the signature of each party, notarized. A judge sided with the man and said that the Prenup was valid because it had standard small print, that it could not be modified or revoked, unless the couple had signed a new agreement in the presence of witnesses. PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS AND THE TRANSCRIPT FROM THE SIGNING CEREMONY SHOULD BE KEPT IN A SAFE PLACE: The protection of a matrimonial contract is as good as the document. If the marriage agreement is lost, hidden, stolen, misplaced, cremated or, for any other reason, cannot be found at the time of divorce or any other event of life, the absence of a marriage agreement cannot be imposed by the Court.